Free public tool · No account needed
Guided self-assessment of an existing record.
Keep your maintenance handoff beside you. Review what it documents, find missing or unclear information, and take clarification questions back to the record owner.
The result uses your answers. AuditIt has not independently checked the record.
Identify the record and its timeline. Answer from the record; leave anything you have not checked as “Not yet reviewed”.
Print or download the current review, including unresolved and excluded checks. You can do this at any point.
For facilities, plant, public works and project-to-operations teams. Apply your own organization’s procedures and requirements.
This checker keeps answers and notes in browser memory and does not send them to application servers, analytics, error reporting or AI services. Ordinary page requests still occur. Downloads and printing happen in your browser.
There are no uploads, saved reviews or emailed results. A browser may restore a tab from memory. Reset clears this page’s review; it does not delete files you already saved.
This self-assessment uses your answers; it has not independently checked the underlying record. It does not determine whether equipment is safe or ready for service, whether an engineering inspection has passed, or whether a handoff meets legal or regulatory requirements. It does not prove a cause, establish liability or responsibility, or verify anyone's authority. Receipt or acknowledgement is not, by itself, technical approval.
Starting a new damage record? Build an equipment damage record with separate observations, reports, suspected causes and decisions.
Review summary — based on your answers
Review of an existing record
Time not captured — printed using browser controls.
No questions answered yet.
This self-assessment uses your answers; it has not independently checked the underlying record. It does not determine whether equipment is safe or ready for service, whether an engineering inspection has passed, or whether a handoff meets legal or regulatory requirements. It does not prove a cause, establish liability or responsibility, or verify anyone's authority. Receipt or acknowledgement is not, by itself, technical approval.
None reported in this review.
None reported in this review.
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: An unambiguous subject helps the recipient connect the record to the right task.
Ask or clarify: Which asset, system or reference identifies this handoff?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: A bounded purpose explains what this record is about.
Ask or clarify: Which task and handoff does this concern?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: Writing and observation can happen at different times.
Ask or clarify: When was this handoff recorded?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: Ambiguous date formats or time context can obscure the sequence.
Ask or clarify: What date format and time context do these entries use?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Related checks: B1, C1, C2, C3
Why it matters: The basis of the condition information determines what this review can cover.
Ask or clarify: Does this handoff contain direct observations, reported condition information, both, or neither?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Related checks: D1, D2
Why it matters: Reported information needs to be attributed.
Ask or clarify: Is information from another person or document included?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Related checks: E1
Why it matters: Uncertain explanations need to remain distinguishable from established observations.
Ask or clarify: Are there any suggested causes or assumptions to label?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: Silence can be mistaken for resolution.
Ask or clarify: What remains unknown or unresolved?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Related checks: F1, F2
Why it matters: A pending decision is different from a missing decision record.
Ask or clarify: What decision state does the record explicitly describe?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Related checks: G1, G2, G3
Why it matters: An unstated next step does not mean there is nothing left to do.
Ask or clarify: Does the record describe outstanding work or explicitly explain why none remains?
Answer: Not yet reviewed
Why it matters: Acknowledging receipt and approving technical work are different statements.
Ask or clarify: Does this mean received, reviewed or technically approved, and where is that distinction recorded?
